MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1928475106 · doi:10.22230/cjc.2002v27n2a1299

Tending to Society, Tending to Yourself: The Roles of Culture

2002· article· en· W1928475106 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Terry Cheney

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Communication · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchema (genetic algorithms)SociologyYouth cultureEnvironmental ethicsOrder (exchange)Public relationsPolitical scienceBusinessGender studiesComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the role that cultural activities may play in the lives of youth. First, it reviews the general roles that culture is argued to play in society. It then looks at a schema of communications in an individual's life, hinting at the roles culture may play in this and arguing that studying culture and youth is part of a more comprehensive research framework in order to place the particular role of culture and youth into a larger picture. It ends by reviewing concrete examples of research on youth and culture, highlighting existing strategic constraints and proposing the need for a more intensive and more broadly based research of the impacts of culture on individuals which would contribute to better understanding and, ultimately, more appropriate culture policies and programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.019
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Communication→Same topicCultural Industries and Urban Development→French-language works237,207→