MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1928512854 · doi:10.1002/2015gb005153

Sea‐air CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in the western Arctic coastal ocean

2015· article· en· W1928512854 on OpenAlexaff
Wiley Evans, Jeremy T. Mathis, Jessica Cross, Nicholas R. Bates, Karen E. Frey, Brent Else, Tim N. Papkyriakou, M. D. DeGrandpre, Fakhrul Islam, Wei‐Jun Cai, Baoshan Chen, Michiyo Yamamoto‐Kawai, Eddy C. Carmack, William J. Williams, Taro Takahashi

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceOceanographySeawaterEnvironmental scienceSea ice concentrationArcticArctic ice packBiogeochemical cycleCarbon dioxideClimatologyArctic sea ice declineFlux (metallurgy)Sea ice thicknessAtmospheric sciencesGeologyChemistryEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The biogeochemical seascape of the western Arctic coastal ocean is in rapid transition. Changes in sea ice cover will be accompanied by alterations in sea‐air carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) exchange, of which the latter has been difficult to constrain owing to sparse temporal and spatial data sets. Previous assessments of sea‐air CO 2 flux have targeted specific subregional areas of the western Arctic coastal ocean. Here a holistic approach is taken to determine the net sea‐air CO 2 flux over this broad region. We compiled and analyzed an extensive data set of nearly 600,000 surface seawater CO 2 partial pressure ( p CO 2 ) measurements spanning 2003 through 2014. Using space‐time colocated, reconstructed atmospheric p CO 2 values coupled with the seawater p CO 2 data set, monthly climatologies of sea‐air p CO 2 differences (Δ p CO 2 ) were created on a 0.2° latitude × 0.5° longitude grid. Sea‐air CO 2 fluxes were computed using the Δ p CO 2 grid and gas transfer rates calculated from climatology of wind speed second moments. Fluxes were calculated with and without the presence of sea ice, treating sea ice as an imperfect barrier to gas exchange. This allowed for carbon uptake by the western Arctic coastal ocean to be assessed under existing and reduced sea ice cover conditions, in which carbon uptake increased 30% over the current 10.9 ± 5.7 Tg C (1 Tg = 10 12 g) yr −1 of sea ice‐adjusted exchange in the region. This assessment extends beyond previous subregional estimates in the region in an all‐inclusive manner and points to key unresolved aspects that must be targeted by future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207