MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1928658467

The 25th annual meeting of the Canadian College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, June 9-12, 2002.

2002· other· en· W1928658467 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marco Leyton, Simon N. Young, Lalit K. Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropsychopharmacologyLibrary scienceMedicineMedical educationPolitical sciencePsychiatryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 25th Annual Meeting of the Canadian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (CCNP) was held in Ottawa, Ont., Jun. 9–12, 2002. This venue was appropriate for the 25th anniversary of the college as it is the home city of Yvon Lapierre, the first president of the CCNP. This report summarizes 2 plenary lectures, 4 award lectures and 8 symposia. One of these, from the 2001 meeting, was inadvertently left out of the 2001 meeting report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3580.140

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionFrench-language works237,207