MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1928874882 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.4869

Stability of Surface H-2Kb, H-2Db, and Peptide-Receptive H-2Kb on Splenocytes

2001· article· en· W1928874882 on OpenAlexaff
Ruey‐Chyi Su, Richard G. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeptideMHC class IMajor histocompatibility complexMHC restrictionPopulationLymphoblastBiologyCell biologyFlow cytometrySplenocyteChemistryBiophysicsMolecular biologyBiochemistryAntigenCell cultureImmunologyGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have used flow cytometry to study the stability and peptide-binding capability of MHC class I (MHC-I) on the surface of normal C57BL/6 mouse T lymphoblasts. The MHC-I molecules on each cell are nearly evenly divided into two populations with mean half-life values of approximately 1 and 20 h. Our observations suggest that members of the later contain peptide bound with medium to high affinity. Cell surface MHC-I molecules capable of binding exogenous peptide (thus, "peptide-receptive") belong almost entirely to the less stable population. Before exogenous peptide can bind, MHC-I must undergo a change, probably loss of a very low affinity peptide. For MHC-I-K(b), we found that the maximum rate for binding of exogenous peptide corresponds to a t(1/2) value of 12 min. To maintain the 50:50 steady-state distribution of long- vs short-lived MHC-I molecules on the cell surface, approximately 20 short-lived molecules must be exported to the cell surface for each long-lived molecule.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207