Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is a space analysis for the revitalization of the conventional fishery markets in the coastal zones. For this study, we obtained questionnaire data from 409 customers at five conventional fishery markets. Then, we have surveyed and analyzed them with an action grid. The results of this study are as follows: Marine products have place restrictions for sale so the conventional fish markets which are located in coastal zones have potentiality for revitalization. Action Grid of five conventional fishery markets appears development strategies to the revitalization. If almost all Evaluation Factors of the market lie scattered on the first and the third quarter as Nok-dong market, then the market should be maintained the status quo. If almost factors lie scattered on the second and the forth quarter as Mae-il market, then the market should be rebuilt. If almost factors lie scattered on the first, the third and the forth quarter as Jin-nam market, then facilities of the market should be relocated. If almost factors lie scattered on the first and the third quarter and the others lie scattered on the second and the fourth quarter as Kyu-dong and Yeok-jeon market, then facilities of the market should be improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it