O tempo dos padrões que modelam a cidade: Lisboa, os projectos urbanos habitacionais de promoção pública – 1910 | 2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ao facto de a cidade ser, essencialmente, constituída por matéria residencial, a função que, sendo mais “silenciosa” face ao protagonismo do espaço público, é a que constitui o seu tecido conjuntivo da cidade, junta-se a questão da crise da habitação cuja problemática marca o século XX. Neste quadro, através da leitura global dos projectos urbanos habitacionais de promoção pública construídos na cidade de Lisboa entre 1910 e 2012 e das suas invariantes, o trabalho propõem-se estruturar uma leitura tipo-morfológica assente numa leitura diacrónica dos factos. Complementarmente, uma leitura cruzada de factores de ordem supra-estrutural, de abordagens de análise ao nível da relação com a cidade existente, assim como de uma leitura morfológica dos conjuntos edificados, concorrem para esta estruturação e estabilizam sete projectos tipo. The fact that the city is essentially composed of residential tissue, function that being more " silent " over the role of public space is what constitutes its connective tissue, gathers with the fact that a housing crisis as gone through and marked the twentieth century. Considering the above described framework, the research proposes to structure typomorphological study based on a diachronic analysis of urban housing public projects built in Lisbon between 1910 and 2012. The elected tool for defining the analytical path and supporting the results, is a designed based method that allow the establishment of a cross-reading guideline of supra-structural factors, analysis to the relationship with the existing city, as well as a morphological approach of built projects. The research process proposes to stabilize seven types of public housing urban projects built in Lisbon in the 20th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".