Sendai virus N‐terminal fusion peptide consists of two similar repeats, both of which contribute to membrane fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The N-terminal fusion peptide of Sendai virus F1 envelope glycoprotein is a stretch of 14 amino acids, most of which are hydrophobic. Following this region, we detected a segment of 11 residues that are strikingly similar to the N-terminal fusion peptide. We found that, when anchored to the membrane by palmitoylation of its N-terminus, this segment (WT-palm-19-33) induces membrane fusion of large unilamellar liposomes to almost the same extent as a segment that includes the N-terminal fusion peptide. The activity of WT-palm-19-33 was dependent on its specific sequence, as a palmitoylated peptide with the same amino-acid composition but a scrambled sequence was inactive. Interestingly, two mutations (G7A and G12A) known to increase F1- induced cell-cell fusion, also increased the homology between the N-terminal fusion peptide and WT-palm-19-33. The role of the amino-acid sequence on the fusogenicity, secondary structure, and mechanism of membrane fusion was analyzed by comparing a peptide comprising both homologous segments (WT 1-33), a G12A mutant (G12A 1-33), a G7A-G12A double mutant (G7A-G12A 1-33), and a peptide with a scrambled sequence (SC 1-33). Based on these experiments, we postulate that replacement of Gly 7 and Gly12 by Ala increases the alpha helical content of the N-terminal region, with a concomitant increase in its fusogenic activity. Furthermore, the dissimilar abilities of the different peptides to induce membrane negative curvature as well as to promote isotropic 31P NMR signals, suggest that these mutations might also alter the extent of membrane penetration of the 33-residue peptide. Interestingly, our results serve to explain the effect of the G7A and G12A mutations on the fusogenic activity of the parent F1 protein in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".