MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1929026589

해수 열원을 이용한 지역냉방 적용 방안

2011· article· ko· W1929026589 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
진수휘, JinYeong Bak, 김삼열

Bibliographic record

Venue대한설비공학회 학술발표대회논문집 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyGeothermal energyFossil fuelGeothermal gradientEnergy consumptionConsumption (sociology)Natural resource economicsEnergy policyPrimary energyEnvironmental scienceBusinessEconomicsEngineeringWaste managementGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to changes in international energy affairs when the oil crisis and high oil prices undergoing, Energy issues connected with national security has to be taken seriously. To break our dependence on fossil fuels, developed countries give an impetus to long-term national energy policy. but In Korea, It is weak to establish long-term measures. Domestic energy consumption in buildings, especially the ratio of the energy being consumed is closer to 30%. Increasing proportion of building energy consumption must take positive action when it comes to the country's energy problems. With interest in renewable energy use in buildings and Unused Energy , measures are being prepared. Therefore, in this study, Ocean thermal energy applied to the use of Seawater Heat Source technologies in the development of district cooling systems are discussed and the building using the lake for cooling systems in Toronto, Canada is looked at. Gang-won where the geothermal heat is high were compared by applying Seawater Heat Source District Cooling System.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue대한설비공학회 학술발표대회논문집Same topicEngineering Applied ResearchFrench-language works237,207