MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1929128907 · doi:10.1002/047147844x.wr157

Valuing Water Resources

2004· other· en· W1929128907 on OpenAlexaff
Diane Dupont, Steven Renzetti

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Encyclopedia · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Environmental Valuation
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWillingness to payCornerstoneWelfareValue (mathematics)EconomicsPoint (geometry)Quality (philosophy)Natural resource economicsPublic economicsBusinessMicroeconomicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The starting point for most economic methods for measuring the value of water is an understanding of the structure of household tastes or preferences and firms' productive technologies. This understanding can then be used to develop measures of the benefits of water use and the change in household welfare or firm profits that arise from changes in the price, quantity, or quality of water. These measures, in turn, allow the analyst to determine the maximum willingness to pay (in the case of a change leading to an improvement in welfare) for water. This idea of willingness to pay forms the cornerstone of economic measures of value. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater EncyclopediaSame topicEconomic and Environmental ValuationFrench-language works237,207