MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1929286131 · doi:10.1139/jpn.0327

Left with the voices or hearing right? Lateralization of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia

2003· letter· en· W1929286131 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Iris E. Sommer, André Alemán, René S. Kahn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2003
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLateralization of brain functionPsychologyAuditory cortexSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)AudiologyNeuroscienceAuditory hallucinationLateralityPerceptionFunctional magnetic resonance imagingFunctional imagingSuperior temporal gyrusBrain activity and meditationCognitive psychologyPsychosisMedicineElectroencephalographyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an important contribution to the literature on the neural basis of hallucinations, Ait Bentaleb et al1 describe, in a patient with schizophrenia, more metabolic activity in the left primary auditory cortex and the right middle temporal gyrus during auditory hallucinations than while listening to external speech. The authors conclude this finding indicates that the hypotheses of defective internal monitoring and of aberrant auditory activation are not mutually exclusive. In addition, however, their finding raises the question of whether hallucinations might be associated with aberrant lateralization of language function. The finding of decreased cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia has been replicated with several techniques.2 In addition, functional imaging studies have reported decreased lateralization of language-related activation in patients with schizophrenia compared with healthy controls.3 It could be hypothesized that inner speech, originating from right cerebral homologues of the language areas, is perceived as auditory hallucinations. Self-produced language activity normally leads to inhibition of language perception areas.4 When this inhibitory mechanism is failing, verbal thoughts may not be recognized as originating from the self and may erroneously be attributed to an external source. Indeed, inhibition of language perception might be more prone to failure when language activity is derived from an unusual site (i.e., from contralateral homologue areas in the right hemisphere). This hypothesis can be tested by reviewing studies meta-analytically that report functional activation in patients with schizophrenia while they are experiencing hallucinations. The following inclusion criteria were used: bilateral measurement of functional activity, right-handed patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, hallucination-related activity measured either in a block design or with event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging protocols. Because we are interested in laterality of the verbal component of auditory hallucinations, our analysis was restricted to activity in areas that are known to be involved in language (i.e., Brodmann areas 21, 22, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45 and 52). Significant hallucination-related activity was statistically integrated and compared among areas in the left and the right hemisphere using the logaritmic risk ratio method. To be less dependent on statistical thresholds of individual studies, data were also analyzed with a vote-counting method, which compares the number of language-related areas that are significantly activated in the right and left hemisphere. Five studies met our inclusion criteria (Table 1), but only 3 could be included in the risk ratio analysis (Lennox et al,6 Dierks et al8 and Shergill et al9) because one study5 provided insufficient data and the other7 did not report activity in language-related areas. The resulting mean, weighted risk ratio (left/right) was 3.42 (95% confidence interval 2.89–4.81; κ = 3; total n = 11), implying stronger activity of left hemisphere language areas. All 5 studies were included in the vote-counting analysis, which also demonstrated that more left hemisphere (n = 14) than right hemisphere (n = 7) language-related brain areas were significantly activated during auditory verbal hallucinations. Table 1 Using 2 different methods, our results showed that language-related areas in the left hemisphere were significantly more activated than the right-sided homotope regions. Thus, the hypothesis that auditory verbal hallucinations arise from a right hemisphere source of language production (inner speech) and are subsequently perceived as originating from an external source is not supported by the available evidence. Instead, these findings call for a more thorough investigation of auditory verbal imagery and language perception in relation to hallucinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSame topicHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceFrench-language works237,207