TLR2 Signaling in Chondrocytes Drives Calcium Pyrophosphate Dihydrate and Monosodium Urate Crystal-Induced Nitric Oxide Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microcrystals of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) and monosodium urate (MSU) deposited in synovium and articular cartilage initiate joint inflammation and cartilage degradation in large part by binding and directly activating resident cells. TLRs trigger innate host defense responses to infectious pathogens, and the expression of certain TLRs by synovial fibroblasts has revealed the potential for innate immune responses to be triggered by mesenchymally derived resident cells in the joint. In this study we tested the hypothesis that chondrocytes also express TLRs and that one or more TLRs centrally mediate chondrocyte responsiveness to CPPD and MSU crystals in vitro. We detected TLR2 expression in normal articular chondrocytes and up-regulation of TLR2 in osteoarthritic cartilage chondrocytes in situ. We demonstrated that transient transfection of TLR2 signaling-negative regulator Toll-interacting protein or treatment with TLR2-blocking Ab suppressed CPPD and MSU crystal-induced chondrocyte release of NO, an inflammatory mediator that promotes cartilage degeneration. Conversely, gain-of-function of TLR2 in normal chondrocytes via transfection was associated with increased CPPD and MSU crystal-induced NO release. Canonical TLR signaling by parallel pathways involving MyD88, IL-1R-associated kinase 1, TNF receptor-associated factor 6, and IkappaB kinase and Rac1, PI3K, and Akt critically mediated NO release in chondrocytes stimulated by both CPPD and MSU crystals. We conclude that CPPD and MSU crystals critically use TLR2-mediated signaling in chondrocytes to trigger NO generation. Our results indicate the potential for innate immunity at the level of the articular chondrocyte to directly contribute to inflammatory and degenerative tissue reactions associated with both gout and pseudogout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".