Anakinra in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Single-center Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess anakinra as a therapy for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) in a single-center series. METHODS: We reviewed 25 patients with sJIA treated with anakinra for at least 6 months. The primary outcome was the number of patients who achieved clinically inactive disease at 6 months, according to preliminary criteria for inactive disease and clinical remission of JIA. RESULTS: Among 25 patients evaluated, 14 (56%) met the criteria for inactive disease at 6 months and were classified as responders. For each individual patient, we compared the dose administered with the ideal dose of anakinra and we found that there was no relation with response. We also compared demographic characteristics and clinical and laboratory features at baseline in responders and non-responders: no differences were observed in relation with the number of active joints before starting anakinra or concomitant glucocorticoids treatment. The only variable significantly associated with response was the time from disease onset to receiving anakinra, with earlier treatment being associated with a better outcome. CONCLUSION: Anakinra is associated with rapid attainment of inactive disease in a significant portion of patients. We found that only the earlier treatment is associated with better outcome. However, formal studies on early treatment and on the pathophysiology and response to treatments, including anakinra, of early- and late-onset sJIA are needed to optimize the management of this challenging disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".