Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, for each finite group |$G$|, we construct the first explicit examples of non-compact complete finite-volume arithmetic hyperbolic 4-manifolds |$M$| such that |${\rm Isom}\,M \cong G$|, or |${\rm Isom}^{+}\,M \cong G$|. In order to do so, we use essentially the geometry of Coxeter polytopes in the hyperbolic 4-space, on the one hand, and the combinatorics of simplicial complexes, on the other hand. This allows us to obtain a universal upper bound on the minimal volume of a hyperbolic 4-manifold realizing a given finite group |$G$| as its isometry group in terms of the order of the group. We also obtain asymptotic bounds for the growth rate, with respect to volume, of the number of hyperbolic 4-manifolds having a finite group |$G$| as their isometry group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it