Using 3D-SHORE and MAP-MRI to obtain both tractography and microstructural constrast from a clinical DMRI acquisition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is used to characterize the directionality and microstructural properties of brain white matter (WM) by measuring the diffusivity of water molecules. In clinical practice the number of dMRI samples that can be obtained is limited, and one often uses short scanning protocols that acquire just 32 to 64 different gradient directions using a single gradient strength (b-value). Such `single shell' scanning protocols restrict one to use methods that have assumptions on the radial decay of the dMRI signal over different b-values, which introduces estimation biases. In this work we show, that by simply spreading the same number of samples over multiple b-values (i.e. multi-shell) we can accurately estimate both the WM directionality using 3D-SHORE and characterize the radially dependent diffusion microstructure measures using MAP-MRI. We validate our approach by undersampling both noisy synthetic and human brain data of the Human Connectome Project, proving this approach is well-suited for clinical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".