The Contribution of Critical Thinking Skills and Metacognitive Awareness on Students’ Learning: Teaching Biology at Senior High School
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="zhengwen"><span lang="EN-GB">This research aimed to examine<strong> </strong>the contribution of critical thinking skills and metacognitive awareness on biology learning in class XI at a government senior high school in Makassar. The research was a correlational <em>ex post facto</em> study, and the population studied consisted of students attending the selected government Senior High Schools in Makassar for the 2013/2014 academic year. Samples were chosen according to random sampling<em> </em>clusters<em>. </em>The Data was analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. Research results showed that (1) Both critical thinking skills and metacognitive awareness contributed positively to biology students’ learning outcomes in class XI, (2) Critical thinking skills contributed positively to biology students’ learning in class XI at senior high school, (3) Metacognitive awareness contributed positively on biology students’ learning outcomes.</span></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".