Effect of ionic strength and oxidation on the P‐loop conformation of the protein tyrosine phosphatase‐like phytase, PhyAsr
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP)-like phytase, PhyAsr, from Selenomonas ruminantium is a novel member of the PTP superfamily, and the only described member that hydrolyzes myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate. In addition to the unique substrate specificity of PhyAsr, the phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) has been reported to undergo a conformational change from an open (inactive) to a closed (active) conformation upon ligand binding at low ionic strength. At high ionic strengths, the P-loop was observed in the closed, active conformation in both the presence and absence of ligand. To test whether the P-loop movement can be induced by changes in ionic strength, we examined the effect that ionic strength has on the catalytic efficiency of PhyAsr, and determined the structure of the enzyme at several ionic strengths. The catalytic efficiency of PhyAsr is highly sensitive to ionic strength, with a seven-fold increase in k(cat)/K(m) and a ninefold decrease in K(m) when the ionic strength is increased from 100 to 500 mm. Surprisingly, the P-loop is observed in the catalytically competent conformation at all ionic strengths, despite the absence of a ligand. Here we provide structural evidence that the ionic strength dependence of PhyAsr and the conformational change in the P-loop are not linked. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the previously reported P-loop conformational change is a result of irreversible oxidation of the active site thiolate. Finally, we rationalize the observed P-loop conformational changes observed in all oxidized PTP structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".