Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityMcGill UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMFCarleton UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of VictoriaUniversité de MontréalInstitute of Particle PhysicsUniversity of Regina
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaH. Lundbeck A/SState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueIsrael Science FoundationLundbeckfondenLeverhulme TrustGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchNational Science CouncilJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiCERNDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionNational Science FoundationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFMax-Planck-GesellschaftRoyal SocietyComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaDanmarks GrundforskningsfondTürkiye Atom Enerjisi Kurumu
KeywordsLarge Hadron ColliderAtlas (anatomy)PhysicsDetectorElectronNuclear physicsCalorimeter (particle physics)LuminosityProtonAtlas detectorCollisionOpticsAstrophysicsComputer science
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexDetailed measurements of the electron performance of the ATLAS detector at the LHC are reported, using decays of the Z, W and J / particles. Data collected in 2010 at s = 7 TeV are used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of almost 40 pb -1 . The inter-alignment of the inner detector and the electromagnetic calorimeter, the determination of the electron energy scale and resolution, and the performance in terms of response uniformity and linearity are discussed. The electron identification, reconstruction and trigger efficiencies, as well as the charge misidentification probability, are also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
