Les savoirs des fans à travers deux communautés Web
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deux conceptions differentes du fan sont vehiculees dans les discours sociaux sur la culture populaire: la figure du fan excessif et celle du fan serieux. Cet article questionne le bien-fonde de cette distinction, en analysant le meme type de pratique (soit l'accumulation de savoirs via les sites Web), selon une organisation commune (la communaute de fans). Des sites Web de deux communautes de fans, celles de Norah Jones et de Kylie Minogue, ont ete etudies. Les sites de ces deux communautes Web comptent generalement les memes offres de contenu pour les deux chanteuses. Celles-ci demontrent des savoirs considerables, manifestes et latents, de la part des fans qui concoivent ces sites et qui font partie de leur communaute Web. A travers tous ces types de savoirs mobilises, il est possible de constater que les fans, qu'ils fassent partie des « excessifs » ou des « aficionados », consacrent une energie considerable afin d'accumuler un impressionnant volume de savoirs autour de leur idole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it