MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1931258374 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2015.50

Impact of Vegetation On Early Pennsylvanian Fluvial Channels: Insight From the Joggins Formation of Atlantic Canada

2015· article· en· W1931258374 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alessandro Ielpi, Martin R. Gibling, Arden R. Bashforth, Chinemerem I. Dennar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyAggradationPennsylvanianFluvialVegetation (pathology)Riparian zoneChannel (broadcasting)PaleontologyGeomorphologyEcologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Riparian vegetation profoundly influences modern fluvial channels in a variety of ways, depending on the life-history strategies of different plant types, disturbance frequency, and drainage conditions of available habitats. Direct evidence for these dynamic relationships is usually cryptic in ancient deposits. We report evidence for interactions between rivers and in situ vegetation for selected sites in the lower Pennsylvanian Joggins Formation of Atlantic Canada, encompassing fixed, meandering, and distributary channels originally up to 6 m deep. Channel bodies are associated with a suite of fossilized plant remains, specifically lycopsids that preferred stable wetland settings, disturbance-tolerant calamitaleans, and slow-growing, long-lived cordaitaleans. Vegetation was effective in stabilizing banks and bars and promoting aggradation. Lycopsids and calamitalean groves colonized the channel bed during periods of reduced flow, drawing on the groundwater table, and mounds around upright trunks indicate that they formed bar nuclei after flow resumed. Bank-attached bars with lateral-accretion sets contain upright trees, which may have stabilized inclined sediment surfaces, and trees present between small distributary channels may have formed vegetated islands. Erect lycopsids rooted below the channel base project up into the channel fill, where they formed obstacles and nucleated sediment mounds in active channels. On channel cutbanks, upright lycopsids are tilted towards the channel, and early formed rhizoconcretions are associated with deep cordaitalean root systems in the tops of channel fills. These features imply that vegetation contributed to stabilization of sediment surfaces. The predominance of in situ over transported plant remains suggests that these low-flow-strength rivers had limited ability to erode and entrain large woody debris, especially for small channels with strengthened banks. We infer that patterns of interaction between vegetation and rivers with a range of fluvial style broadly resembled those of today. By the early Pennsylvanian, rivers had moved from a geomorphic and biogeomorphic mode of operation into a fully ecological mode with prominent feedback loops between vegetation and fluvial processes. Vegetation is commonly poorly preserved in fluvial systems but should be incorporated into facies models for Pennsylvanian and younger strata, possibly also for some Devonian and Mississippian formations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207