Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay explores aspects of passion in three Acadian poems, Herménégilde Chiasson’s “Rouge” (“Red”) which first appeared in Mourir à Scoudouc in 1974, Henri-Dominique Paratte’s “Rouge Sang” (“Blood Red”) which first appeared in Éloizes: Revue de l’Association des écrivains acadiens in 1984, and “La petite sorcière rouge...” (The little red witch), an excerpt from Dyane Léger’s L’incendiaire, published in 2008 in collaboration with Paul Savoie. Although there is a period of 34 years between the publication of the first and last work, and they range in form from the prose poem to lineated free verse, all three share the leitmotif of the passionate colour red with its many, often opposing, symbolic, historical, and literary associations; the list as a poetic device that incorporates past and present, real and surreal, poetic and political; and finally the love story, which aspires towards a happy ending, however elusive. The red of fire and blood that marked Le Grand Dérangement of 1755 is a testament to the passion of a people determined to endure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".