MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1931709921

High-throughput LDPC decoding using the RHS algorithm

2012· article· en· W1931709921 on OpenAlexaff
François Leduc-Primeau, Alexandre J. Raymond, Pascal Giard, Kevin Cushon, Claude Thibeault, Warren J. Gross

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeComputer scienceDecoding methodsThroughputAlgorithmApplication-specific integrated circuitCode wordCMOSClock rateBit error rateLatency (audio)Soft-decision decoderParallel computingComputer engineeringComputer hardwareWirelessElectronic engineeringChipTelecommunicationsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relaxed half-stochastic (RHS) algorithm is a recently proposed binary message-passing decoding algorithm for low-density parity check codes that can reach the same error rate performance as belief propagation algorithms that exchange LLR messages. Because of its low-complexity interleaver, the RHS algorithm makes it possible to achieve a fully-parallel implementation that can converge to a codeword in only a few clock cycles on average, enabling high throughput and power efficiency. To demonstrate the practicality of the RHS algorithm, we implement a decoder for the popular IEEE 802.3an 10GBASE-T standard. The paper presents details of the hardware implementation, as well as post-layout results for an ASIC implementation in 65nm CMOS technology, which indicate that the decoder can operate at 448 MHz and occupies an area of 4.41 mm2. The results obtained from bit-accurate software simulations show that the decoder meets the latency requirement prescribed by the standard and provides an average throughput of 160 Gbps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207