MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1931785754 · doi:10.1109/icpadm.2015.7295448

Radio frequency (RF) technique for field inspection of porcelain insulators

2015· article· en· W1931785754 on OpenAlexaff
Shaharyar Anjum, Shesha Jayaram, Ayman El‐Hag, Ali Naderian Jahromi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsKinectrics (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadio frequencyInsulator (electricity)Partial dischargeComputer scienceCeramicElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringReliability engineeringAcousticsEngineeringMaterials scienceVoltageTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

North American utilities are increasingly concerned with their ageing ceramic insulator assets as they are either fast approaching their expected end of life or have already exceeded them. Defects like broken, cracked and punctured discs are some of the most adverse problems that the utilities encounter. These defects give rise to the initiation of partial discharge (PD) activities within the samples which has a detrimental effect on the insulator life. Hence it is important for the utilities to identify such defective samples as early as possible so that appropriate replacement strategies can be devised. Currently used PD techniques are off-line and are not suitable for detecting defective insulators in the field without interrupting the power supply. In this work, experiments are performed; simulating the actual field environment in an effort to develop a non-contact radio frequency (RF) based condition monitoring system for defective ceramic insulators. RF signatures captured in the field due to PD activities from two different defects are post processed; which involves noise removal and other signal processing techniques to extract appropriate wavelet packet based features. These features are then used to train and test artificial neural network (ANN) classifier. For the tests conducted, high recognition rates above 90% have been achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207