Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lorsqu'une explosion a detruit le wagon du leader de la communaute pacifiste religieuse des Doukhobors, tuant leur aristocrate leader, sa compagne âgee de 17 ans et sept autres personnes, incluant un membre de la legislature, pres de Castlegar, C.-B., en octobre 1924, plusieurs theories sur les auteurs de l'attentat ont emerge. S'agissait-il de dissidents doukhobors, mecontents de sa facon de vivre materialiste, de fanatiques nativistes, jaloux du succes des emigres russes, d'agents des gouvernements du Canada ou de la Colombie-Britannique voulant ebranler le pacifisme des Doukhobors et leur resistance a l'education publique, du propre fils de Verigin, d'ennemis russes qui voulaient regler d'anciens comptes ou simplement d'un accident? A ce jour, l'explosion qui a ebranle la communaute des Doukhobors et mis au jour l'attitude des Canadiens face aux immigrants a l'epoque de l'entre-deux-guerres, demeure un mystere non resolu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.033 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".