Témoignage d'un parcours personnel/professionnel de la Gestalt au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article présente un témoignage personnel/professionnel du développement de la Gestalt-thérapie au Québec depuis le début des années 1970. Dans un premier temps, il met en relief les principaux éléments présentés par l’Ecole du Gestalt Institute of Cleveland. Il expose ensuite certaines remises en question formulées au cours des deux dernières décennies où les auteurs ont insisté sur la nécessité de revoir les assises philosophiques de la Gestalt-thérapie et la mise en valeur de la relation dialogique continue. Les nouvelles avenues tendent à expliciter des dimensions restées embryonnaires dans la théorie de base comme la dimension corporelle, une vision du Soi-dans-le-champ en prolongement de l’unité organisme/environnement ainsi qu’une nouvelle perpective du développement psychologique de l’enfant inspirée des plus récentes recherches et théories. Après avoir souligné la souplesse de la théorie gestaltiste, la conclusion souligne les pièges que cette flexibilité engendre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".