Susan K. Morrissey. Heralds of Revolution: Russian Studentsand the Mythologies of Radicalism. New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 1998. Pp. 288.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Historical Studies in Education/Revue d'histoire de l'éducationMilloy truly recognizes an injustice, but such a singular perspective and one which lacks critical analysis of all parties involved in residential education must leave the reader wary.Milloy appears to be defensive on behalf of the government, does not give voice to Aboriginal peoples, and puts much of the responsibility on religious associations.He in effect negates the government's role in the government's ill-conceived plan to assimilate Aboriginal peoples.If the government can publicly acknowledge the role it played in the development and administration of these schools (Globe and Mail, 8 January 1998, A19), then surely Milloy could have delineated for readers this accountability."A National Crime" has the potential to be a major source for discussion of residential schooling, but in practice it does little to move the discussion along.Aboriginal peoples are once again silent victims, the churches silent perpetrators, and that's it.Intended to explain the past, "A National Crime" more exemplifies what was the problem in the first place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".