MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1932847494 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2013-0037

Thermal performance of self-compacting concrete: destructive and nondestructive evaluation

2013· article· en· W1932847494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire effects on concrete materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressive strengthMaterials scienceComposite materialAggregate (composite)Relative humidityElastic modulusCementHumidityYoung's modulus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, self-compacting concrete (SCC) has been increasingly used in high-rise buildings and industrial units, susceptible to accidental fires. The probable degradation of these structures necessitates understanding SCC behavior under elevated temperatures. For this, an extensive experimental investigation was undertaken to evaluate the effect of elevated temperature (300–600 °C) on the mechanical compressive properties of SCC; considering the effect of water-to-cement ratio (0.40–0.50), type of mineral aggregate and filler (limestone and basalt), and internal humidity. Standard cylinder (150 mm × 300 mm) and prism (100 mm × 100 mm × 300 mm) specimens were prepared from various SCC mixtures, cured for 28 d in limewater, and then stored at different environments for an additional 90 d to create varying internal humidity levels; ranging from 28 to 95%. Later, specimens were subjected to elevated temperatures in an electrical furnace, then cooled and tested for compressive mechanical response or non-destructively using resonance frequency, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and rebound hammer evaluation techniques. The results showed significant reduction in residual compressive strength, and elastic modulus, and an increase in compressive strain at peak stress and toughness as elevated temperature was increased. The SCC mixtures at upper water-to-cement ratios with basalt aggregate showed higher resistance to elevated temperatures than corresponding ones with limestone. Internal humidity in SCC had a detrimental impact on compressive strength and elastic modulus; especially at exposure temperatures below 400 °C. The statistical correlations between residuals for compressive strength or elastic modulus and nondestructive damage indices can be classified as very good. Furthermore, the nonlinear empirical models, developed to predict residuals for compressive strength and elastic modulus in terms of the study parameters, showed relatively high prediction potential, hence are recommended to be used in designing SCC mixtures for best resistance against possible fire attack.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it