Optimiser le fonctionnement cognitif au cours du vieillissement: facteurs de réserve, stimulation cognitive et plasticité cérébrale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Les préoccupations relatives à l’intégrité intellec tuelle et cognitive prennent une place importante chez les aînés et celles-ci sont souvent reliées à l’éventualité de développer la maladie d’Alzheimer. Le déclin de la mémoire et des capacit és cognitives suscitent de l’inquiétude chez la population vieillissante et dépeignent une vision n égative du vieillissement cognitif. Le but de cet article est d’apporter divers arguments empiriques qui remettent en cause cette vision strictement négative en montrant que le vieillissement cognitif est multiple, qu’il peut être adapté et également hautement plastique. Cet article porte sur la notio n de réserve cognitive, sur différents modes d’optimisation du vieillissement cognitif et sur le s différents modèles de plasticité cérébrale au cours du vieillissement."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".