MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1933388954

A mineralogical and geochemical investigation of sulfide mineralization in the McConnell Ni-Cu-PGE occurrence, McConnell Offset Dyke, Garson Mine area, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

2015· article· en· W1933388954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brandon Boucher

Bibliographic record

VenueSaint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySulfideMineralization (soil science)GeochemistryMineralogyPyrrhotiteMining engineeringPyriteSoil scienceMetallurgyMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sudbury mining camp hosts the largest and only known impact-related metallogenic system in the world, containing significant resources of Cu-Ni-platinum group element-rich sulfide mineralization. The undeveloped, Vale-owned McConnell concentric offset dyke hosts low Ni grade magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide mineralization with unusually high PGE tenor, showing marked differences in mineralogy and geochemistry compared to other South Range offset-type deposits. This study shows that: (i) the low As, Ni, and high PGE in bulk assays and Co and Pd-rich pentlandite in the ores reflects an unusual evolution of the McConnell sulfide melt explained by three possible models, or a combination of models (“uncontaminated”, “locally enriched”, and “late-stage” sulfide melts); (ii) a post-crystallization hydrothermal fluid passed through the system, remobilizing Ni and Pb within the deposit and altering primary ore mineralogy forming pyrite and marcasite; and (iii) the McConnell ores crystallized from an O-rich Ni-poor sulfide melt, as reflected by magnetite geochemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSaint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→