Determination and Measurement of Poverty Within Small Island Caribbean States
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Countries that constitute themselves into a single market and economy face numerous challenges at both national and regional levels of the new formed alliance to which they have now subscribed. There are international influences (external shocks) with which to cope as well, These developments bring with them changes involving structural reform measures, trade policy reforms and a whole new dimension to the relationship that exist between Caribbean countries and with others at the global level. Countries of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) have joined their Latin American and European counterparts in being inducted into a single economic space and in embracing a common development vision to which they have avowed to subscribe. Membership within this regional community promises to bring several benefits, among these: economic and social policy harmonization; a more progressive economic environment; sharing of the burden of the impacts of global trade and international shocks with which they must periodically contend; forging of social partnerships and free movement of goods and services, capital and people within the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it