MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1933661356 · doi:10.7202/1022860ar

Société de l’information et infobésité : perceptions et représentations croisées

2014· article· fr· W1933661356 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marie Reibel, Nadine Desrochers

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentation et bibliothèques · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicPersonal Information Management and User Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologySociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude qualitative de contenu vise à interroger les concepts de société de l’information et d’infobésité auprès d’un petit groupe d’étudiants par l’entremise d’un questionnaire en ligne. Des représentations artistiques de ces concepts ont été présentées aux répondants afin d’évaluer leurs perceptions. Les résultats obtenus mettent l’accent sur la valeur de l’information, une forte présence de la communauté et révèlent également un rapport au temps singulier. Les données ont été analysées à la lumière d’un cadre conceptuel comprenant quatre auteurs : Daniel Bell, Manuel Castells, Roland Barthes et Lev Manovich.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0150.067
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentation et bibliothèquesSame topicPersonal Information Management and User BehaviorFrench-language works237,207