Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current state of both the economic theory and the economic practice requires not “minor repairs”, but the entire re-thinking of the foundations of the existence of economics as one of the social sub-systems in the unified system Nature-Society-Human. It is clear that the way to surmount the ongoing economic collapse should be searched not in other “methods” of implementation of the principles that led to it, but in finding new principles of the whole economic system. As one of the possible variants of considering the problem we propose the author’s concept of the knowledge-based economy in accordance to which the scientific knowledge is viewed as the key resource of the formation of the social wealth, and the process of its production is considered to be an integrated technological chain consisting of the mental, information and material productions. This approach brings about the necessity of radical reconsideration of the whole system of economic categories and the models, methods, criteria and indicators based on this system. At the same time it provides us with simple guidelines in the complex theoretical disputes and in the practical activities aimed at forming the basics of the knowledge-based economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it