MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Basil Bunting’s Objectivist Perspective in Poetry and Musical Association

2011· article· en· W1933858795 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuntingObjectivismPoetryModernism (music)HumanitiesPhilosophyKey (lock)ArtArt historyLiteratureEpistemologyComputer scienceBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basil Bunting, British poet, is one of the rare great modernists who have not been given their due or properly studied. An understanding of his work will help us understand modernism more appropriately. Reference will also be made to opponents who put sight and visuality over and above everything else in man’s effort to acquire knowledge of this world in general. The researchers in this article seek to achieve two goals in this paper. The first or the main goal is to consider the Modern English poet Basil Bunting’s Objectivist roots according to Mitchell’s paper in 2008. The second goal, which naturally emerges from the first one is to present sound play from Bunting’s own view and define them, regarding to Schott’s contributions in 2003, in a part of his long poem, Briggflatts, which lead to the kind of Aural and visual dancing. Then we will conclude , as Bunting mentions more and more, poetry is only its sound. Key words: Bunting; Objectivism; Poetry; Sound; Visuality; Aurality Resume: Basil Bunting, poete britannique, est l'un des rares grands modernistes qui n'ont pas recu leur du ou n'ont pas ete bien etudies. Une bonne comprehension de son travail nous aidera a comprendre le modernisme de facon plus appropriee. Des references seront egalement faits pour des opposants qui ont mis la vue et la visualite au-dela de tout le reste de l'effort de l'homme d'acquerir des connaissances de ce monde en general. Les chercheurs de cet article visent a atteindre deux objectifs dans le present document. Le premier ou le principal but est d'examiner les racines objectivistes du poete moderne anglais Basil Bunting selon le document de Mitchell en 2008. Le deuxieme objectif, qui decoule naturellement du premiere objectif est de presenter diffuser un show sonore du point de vue personnel de Bunting et les definir, en se referencant aux contributions de Schott en 2003, dans une partie de son poeme long, Briggflatts, qui conduit a une sorte de bande sonore et de danse visuelle. Ensuite, nous allons conclure que, comme Bunting mentionne de plus en plus, la poesie est seulement le son. Mots-cles: Bunting; Objectivisme; PoESie; Son; VisualitE; Auriculaire

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it