MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934266923 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2000.900846

A semi-empirical treatment planning model for optimization of multiprobe cryosurgery

2002· article· en· W1934266923 on OpenAlexaff
Roustem Baissalov, George A. Sandison, Bryan Donnelly, John C. Saliken, Ken Muldrew, John C. Rewcastle

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryosurgeryComputer scienceFinite element methodTransient (computer programming)Set (abstract data type)Protocol (science)HistogramArtificial intelligenceThermodynamicsPhysicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model is presented for treatment planning of multiprobe cryosurgery. In this model a thermal simulation algorithm is used to generate temperature distribution from cryoprobes, visualize isotherms in the anatomical region of interest, and provide tools to assist estimation of the amount of freezing damage to the target and surrounding normal structures. Calculations may be performed for any given freezing time for the selected set of operation parameters. The thermal simulation is based on solving the transient heat conduction equation using finite element methods for a multiprobe geometry. As an example, a semi-empirical optimization of 2D placement of 6 cryoprobes and their thermal protocol for the first freeze cycle is presented. The effectiveness of the optimized treatment protocol was estimated by generating temperature-volume histograms and calculating the objective function for the anatomy of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207