Espiritualidade e saúde mental no contexto do aconselhamento pastoral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: Esse artigo tem por objetivo abordar as implicaçõesestabelecidas por meio da espiritualidade e saúde mental no contexto e práxis do aconselhamento pastoral a partir da realidade docontexto religioso pentecostal. Os dados analisados fazem parte da pesquisa realizada com pastores pentecostais da cidade de Curitiba no ano de 2012. A partir da fundamentação bíblico-teológica e outros saberes, em especial a psicologia, o autor propõe a compreensão do sofrimento humano sob a perspectiva da promoção da saúde mental bem como por meio da vivência e manifestação da espiritualidadehumana. O artigo tambémdestaca e distingue a importância do aconselhamento de pastores e do aconselhamento a pastores como uma proposta viável de saúde integral do ser humano, especialmente daqueles que dedicam suas vidas ao socorro espiritual. Palavras-chave: Espiritualidade. Saúde Mental. Aconselhamento Pastoral.Abstract: The objective of this paper is to approach the established implications through spirituality and mental health in the context and praxis of pastoral counseling from the reality of Pentecostal religious context. The investigated data arelinked to a research carried out with Pentecostal pastors in Curitiba in 2012. Starting from a biblical-theological ground and other areas of knowledge, especially Psychology, the author presents the comprehension of human suffering from the perspective of mental health promotion as well as through the experience and manifestation of human spirituality. The paper also points out and distinguishes the importance of pastor counseling and of counseling pastors as a viable proposal of human being’s overall health, particularly of those people who dedicate their lives to spiritual care.Keywords: Spirituality. Mental Health. Pastoral Counseling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".