MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934280056 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2000.881778

Bottom classification in very shallow water by high-speed data acquisition

2002· article· en· W1934280056 on OpenAlexafffund
J.M. Preston, William T. Collins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
FundersMinistère de la Défense Nationale
KeywordsSonarAliasingEcho (communications protocol)Synthetic aperture sonarNoise (video)AcousticsGeologySIGNAL (programming language)Waves and shallow waterEcho soundingRange (aeronautics)Computer scienceConvolution (computer science)Remote sensingData acquisitionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Artificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)TelecommunicationsComputer visionEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bottom classification based on echo features and multivariate statistics is now a well established procedure for habitat studies and other purposes, over a depth range from about 5 m to over 1 km. Shallower depths are challenging for several reasons. To classify in depths of less than a metre, a system has been built that acquires echoes at up to 5 MHz and decimates according to the acoustic situation. The digital signal processing accurately maintains the echo spectrum, preventing aliasing of noise onto the signal and preserving its convolution spectral characteristics. Sonar characteristics determine the minimum depth from which quality echoes can be recorded. Trials have been done over sediments characterized visually and by grab samples, in water as shallow as 0.7 m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207