MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W193432010 · doi:10.3138/cjh.39.2.297

Aby Warburg and the Public Purposes of Art in Hamburg

2004· article· en· W193432010 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuralExhibitionContemplationRealmElitePoliticsSociologyAestheticsArt historyLawArtPolitical sciencePaintingPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article considers Aby Warburg’s commitment to popular art education and his role in the creation of monumental artworks in Hamburg’s public realm. It considers his exhibition of drawings by Albrecht Dürer, mounted in the Volksheim in 1905, and examines his involvement with Willy von Beckerath’s mural decoration of the School of Art and Industry between 1913 and 1918. The distinctive nature of Warburg’s pedagogical goals is emphasized, partly by comparison with those of Alfred Lichtwark, director of Hamburg’s Kunsthalle. In an environment of political and social upheaval, Warburg advocated the contemplation of art to Hamburg’s working-class poor and merchant elite as a way of ameliorating social and psychological tensions. The specific episodes discussed in the article help illuminate Warburg s ideas about the public function of artworks. They also highlight the nature of Hamburg’s cultural life as the product of middle-class associations and scholars who devoted themselves to cultural affairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it