Human Security: A New Regionalism for the Caribbean
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
  This study argues that the impetus to reconceptualize security in the Caribbean region has not been as obvious and decisive as it has been in other regions of the international global system. The Caribbean security approach remains delimited by the traditional security paradigm and has not made the same transition in security thinking. Consequently, it seeks to answer questions such as: Does the Caribbean possess the necessary conditions to adopt a human security approach to regional security? Could the Caribbean experience successful security re-orientation? Can human security emerge as a new regionalism in the Caribbean region? In an attempt to provide an answer to these questions, the role, function and impact of security initiatives in the Caribbean region are examined in an attempt to ascertain to what extent they represent a shift in security thinking, more specifically, how they address the traditional and citizen security issues and to understand this in the context of human security and new regionalism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it