Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir de una investigación empírica realizada por un equipo de investigación de la Universidad de Laval, en Quebec, Canadá, que involucró a 40 hombres jóvenes, trabajadores sexuales (prostitutos de la calle, bailarines nudistas o strippers y acompañantes) se desprendieron cuatro perfiles o escenarios de vida de los entrevistados: 1) “la deriva”, en el cual la toxicomanía y la prostitución van de la mano; 2) “el sobresueldo”, en el cual la prostitución representa un medio provisional u ocasional de aumentar los ingresos de los jóvenes; 3) “la pertenencia”, escenario en el cual la prostitución ya existía en la familia o ha llegado a ser para el joven “su familia”, y 4) “la liberación”, escenario en el cual los jóvenes consideran que las actividades de prostitución les permiten una realización personal en diversos planos de su vida. Concluimos que la prostitución de los jóvenes es un fenómeno plural, algo que deberían tomar en cuenta los programas sociales que intervienen en este sector (particularmente los relacionados con las ETS y el VIH).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".