MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934566053 · doi:10.29340/16.1071

Intimidad en venta: ¿cómo se llega a ser trabajador sexual?

2014· article· es· W1934566053 on OpenAlex
Michel Dorais

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDesacatos · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSexual behaviorPhilosophyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partir de una investigación empírica realizada por un equipo de investigación de la Universidad de Laval, en Quebec, Canadá, que involucró a 40 hombres jóvenes, trabajadores sexuales (prostitutos de la calle, bailarines nudistas o strippers y acompañantes) se desprendieron cuatro perfiles o escenarios de vida de los entrevistados: 1) “la deriva”, en el cual la toxicomanía y la prostitución van de la mano; 2) “el sobresueldo”, en el cual la prostitución representa un medio provisional u ocasional de aumentar los ingresos de los jóvenes; 3) “la pertenencia”, escenario en el cual la prostitución ya existía en la familia o ha llegado a ser para el joven “su familia”, y 4) “la liberación”, escenario en el cual los jóvenes consideran que las actividades de prostitución les permiten una realización personal en diversos planos de su vida. Concluimos que la prostitución de los jóvenes es un fenómeno plural, algo que deberían tomar en cuenta los programas sociales que intervienen en este sector (particularmente los relacionados con las ETS y el VIH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it