MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934606880 · doi:10.1109/ific.2000.862661

Bearings-only tracking using data fusion and instrumental variables

2000· article· en· W1934606880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensor fusionKalman filterEstimatorSmoothingTracking (education)Range (aeronautics)Control theory (sociology)TrajectoryComputer scienceObserver (physics)Monte Carlo methodTracking systemParameterized complexityFusionAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer visionEngineeringStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a recursive Measurement Instrumental Variables Bearings-Only Tracking (MIV-BOT) method for a stationary observer. A smoothing operation directly fuses multi-sensor bearing measurements by exchanging the measurements as the instruments in a pseudo linear estimator. The MIV-BOT formulation produces a smoothed velocity estimate parameterized to any position along the target trajectory, which is found from a single laser range finder measurement. Target range predictions, derived from the smoothed two-state velocity estimate, are then used as range measurements in two parallel Kalman filters. The result is a recursive, passive and unbiased fusion scheme. The theoretical development is investigated by Monte Carlo simulation in short tracking scenarios. Experimental results show that the fusion scheme produces reliable estimates for non-manoeuvring targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it