MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934606880 · doi:10.1109/ific.2000.862661

Bearings-only tracking using data fusion and instrumental variables

2000· article· en· W1934606880 on OpenAlexaff
Y.T. Chan, Terry Rea

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensor fusionKalman filterEstimatorSmoothingTracking (education)Range (aeronautics)Control theory (sociology)TrajectoryComputer scienceObserver (physics)Monte Carlo methodTracking systemParameterized complexityFusionAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer visionEngineeringStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a recursive Measurement Instrumental Variables Bearings-Only Tracking (MIV-BOT) method for a stationary observer. A smoothing operation directly fuses multi-sensor bearing measurements by exchanging the measurements as the instruments in a pseudo linear estimator. The MIV-BOT formulation produces a smoothed velocity estimate parameterized to any position along the target trajectory, which is found from a single laser range finder measurement. Target range predictions, derived from the smoothed two-state velocity estimate, are then used as range measurements in two parallel Kalman filters. The result is a recursive, passive and unbiased fusion scheme. The theoretical development is investigated by Monte Carlo simulation in short tracking scenarios. Experimental results show that the fusion scheme produces reliable estimates for non-manoeuvring targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207