MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934735491 · doi:10.1002/atr.1276

A reinforcement learning approach for distance‐based dynamic tolling in the stochastic network environment

2014· article· en· W1934735491 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Feng Zhu, Satish V. Ukkusuri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTollReinforcement learningComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)ThroughputMarkov chainMarkov decision processQ-learningMathematical optimizationMarkov processSimulationArtificial intelligenceMathematicsMachine learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary This paper proposes a novel dynamic tolling model based on distance and accounts for uncertain traffic demand and supply conditions. The distance‐based tolling controller is modeled as an intelligent agent interacting within the stochastic network environment dynamically by taking actions, which are to decide different distance‐based tolling rates of vehicles. The distance‐based tolls are determined according to various metrics, for example, total traffic flow throughput, delay time, vehicular emissions, which are set as objectives in the modeling framework. The optimal tolling rate is determined by an R‐Markov Average Reward Technique based reinforcement learning algorithm. In the numerical case study, we test the proposed tolling scheme on a benchmark test network—the Sioux Falls network—where specified links are candidate toll links. The result shows that the total travel time of tolling links reduces by 25% over simulation runs. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207