MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical Modeling of the Processes of Coagulation and Dispersion of Drops in Electric Field

2014· article· en· W1934842379 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
К. В. Таранцев

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiphysicsElectric fieldMechanicsPressure dropCoagulationBoundary value problemMechanical engineeringDrop (telecommunication)EngineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsFinite element methodStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results of the physical and mathematical modeling of the processes of producing and disintegrating water-oil emulsions using the COMSOL Multiphysics software, as well as of electric fields, velocity fields, and pressure fields, under boundary conditions that correspond to the apparatuses under development are presented. Based on the analysis of the data obtained, different versions of the design of electric dispersers and electric dehydrators are proposed. Key words : Electric dispersers; Design; Modernization; Physicochemical characteristics; Emulsion; Model fluids; Drop diameter; Field strength

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207