MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934882739 · doi:10.1155/2001/419259

Multiple Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Steatohepatitis: Atypical Imaging Characteristics

2001· article· en· W1934882739 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Robert P. Myers, Dónal Downey, Subrata Chakrabarti, Paul J. Marotta

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocal nodular hyperplasiaMedicineMalignancySteatohepatitisPathologyRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingHyperplasiaUltrasoundBiopsyFatty liverInternal medicineHepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focal nodular hyperplasia is a rare, benign condition of the liver. A 28-year-old woman with malignant melanoma, mild liver enzyme abnormalities, steatohepatitis and newly documented hepatic lesions is described. Ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging suggested only areas of focal fatty sparing but could not eliminate the concern for metastases. A (99m)technetium-labelled sulphur colloid scan, however, revealed areas of increased uptake consistent with multiple focal nodular hyperplasia. This diagnosis was ultimately confirmed with a liver biopsy. The investigation of a patient with a malignancy and expanding hepatic lesions is challenging. This case illustrates the usefulness of the (99m)technetium-labelled sulphur colloid scan in the evaluation of patients with hepatic lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of GastroenterologySame topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisFrench-language works237,207