MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1935036573 · doi:10.1139/p2012-052

Autoionization resonances in the argon iso-electronic sequence

2012· article· en· W1935036573 on OpenAlexaffvenue
J. George, G. B. Pradhan, M. Rundhe, Jobin Jose, G. Aravind, P. C. Deshmukh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersIndian Institute of Technology MadrasDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsAutoionizationPhysicsQuantum defectPhotoionizationAtomic physicsExcited stateArgonSpectral lineResonance (particle physics)Sequence (biology)Fano planeIonIonizationRydberg formulaQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report results of theoretical studies of 3s → np and 2s → np autoionization resonances, respectively, in the 3p and the 2p photoionization cross sections of a few members (Ar, K+, Ca2+, Fe8+, Zn12+, and Kr18+) of the argon isoelectronic sequence, within the framework of the relativistic random phase approximation and using the relativistic multichannel quantum defect theory. The present approach would enable analysis of complex atomic spectra especially of atomic and (or) ionic species that are found in stellar gases in a computationally economical way. The shape profiles of the autoionization resonances have been analyzed in the present work using appropriate Fano parameters. The quantum defects determined for some of the lower or intermediate excited states are found to be in good agreement with the experimental and (or) theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicAtomic and Molecular Physics→French-language works237,207→