MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effect of Chemerin on Glucose Homeostasis

2009· article· en· W193590679 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew C. Ernst, Christopher J. Sinal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicApelin-related biomedical research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemerinAdipokineEndocrinologyInternal medicineGlucose homeostasisAdipose tissueWhite adipose tissueType 2 diabetesBiologyDiabetes mellitusInsulin resistanceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity, characterized by excess adipose mass, is a growing epidemic that increases the risk for developing cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Different mechanisms linking obesity with these comorbidities have been postulated, but remain poorly understood. Adipose tissue secretes a number of hormone‐like compounds, termed adipokines, that are important for the maintenance of normal glucose metabolism. Alterations in the secretion of adipokines are believed to contribute to the undesirable changes in glucose metabolism that commonly occur with obesity. Ultimately, this can result in the development of type 2 diabetes. We have identified a small secreted protein, chemerin, as a novel adipokine. Our study has shown that in mouse models of obesity, serum chemerin levels are significantly elevated and the expression of chemerin and its receptors, chemokine‐like receptor 1 and chemokine (C‐C motif) receptor‐like 2 are altered in white adipose, liver, pancreas, and skeletal muscle tissue. In addition, administration of exogenous chemerin exacerbates glucose intolerance and decreases serum insulin levels in obese mouse models. Therefore, chemerin has an important role in glucose homeostasis and may influence the metabolic derangements that result in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Funding: CIHR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicApelin-related biomedical researchFrench-language works237,207