MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1935929507 · doi:10.1136/adc.2006.095851

Review of pediatric gastrointestinal disease and nutrition

2006· article· en· W1935929507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
MP Tighe

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhraseGastrointestinal systemPediatric gastroenterologyDiseasePediatricsPathologyInternal medicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Edited by Jeannie Huang, W Allan Walker. Ontario: BC Decker, 2005, £27.00 (US$45 (approx.), €40 (approx.)), paperback, pp 293. ISBN 1550093002 “It’s like Marmite, you either love it or hate it.” This phrase must be one of the most common modern cliches—and can be applied to certain films, certain choices within paediatrics, as well as many gastronomic choices. It can also be applied to this book, which will improve your knowledge of paediatric gastroenterology, if you like information in quick bullet points. This review aims to support an earlier text, Pediatric Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology , 4th edition (by the same authors) which was reviewed in an earlier issue of Archives ,1 but can also function as a stand-alone review, in which light it therefore …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207