Tres afirmaciones sobre pobreza, ciclo económico y desigualdad social desde los años noventa en Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se plantea que desde el último cuarto del siglo pasado la transición\ndemográfica creó condiciones para el aumento del ingreso per cápita, pero\nno hubo reducción de la pobreza, porque para una disminución significativa\nde ésta es preciso actuar sobre las desigualdades para atenuarlas. Finalmente,\nse argumenta que en Colombia nunca se ha intentado la reducción de las\ndesigualdades y, en su lugar, la ortodoxia siempre ha propuesto como remedio\na la pobreza y la desigualdad, el crecimiento económico. Se demuestra que\nel ciclo económico, aún en su fase expansiva, no está en capacidad de actuar\nsobre el componente estructural que reproduce la pobreza, y tan sólo lo hace\nde manera marginal en la coyuntura de crecimiento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".