The Theophilus Relief at Souillac and the Eleventh-Century Reforms of the Church
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le relief de Théophile situé sur le mur occidental de la nef de l’église de Souillac (vers 1120–1140) est plus qu’une simple illustration de la légende théophilienne : il communique un message aux moines instruits. Puisant parmi certains thèmes moins connus de la légende, ce relief met en garde contre les desseins diaboliques sous-jacents à la nomination des dignitaires haut placés de l’Église. Soutenue par une analyse d’ensembles sculptés provenant des environs de Souillac, notre interprétation replace le relief de Théophile dans le contexte historique de la période de la réforme de l’Église qui venait de s’achever – réforme qui toucha principalement des questions relatives à la nomination du haut clergé alors que la vente par les simonistes de dignités ecclésiastiques fut éradiquée et la papauté prit en charge la sélection des métropolitains et évêques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".