Capital social et ambivalence intergénérationnelle : le soutien parental aux jeunes qui ont quitté les études secondaires sans diplôme1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article met en évidence les dynamiques relationnelles entre des jeunes et leurs parents dans la production du capital social pouvant faciliter l’insertion professionnelle. Le cas étudié concerne plus spécifiquement de jeunes adultes (n=32) ayant délaissé leurs études secondaires et que nous avons interviewés de quatre à six ans après leur départ de l’école. Bien que dernièrement les relations entre les jeunes et leurs parents soient surtout décrites en termes d’entente intergénérationnelle, la notion d’ambivalence intergénérationnelle permet de mieux rendre compte des relations parents-enfants au moment de l’abandon des études et, par la suite, au cours du processus d’insertion professionnelle. L’analyse montre que l’absence d’ambivalence ou les possibilités de la tolérer et de la résoudre apparaissent comme des conditions essentielles à la production du capital social. Le niveau de scolarité des parents semble avoir peu d’incidence sur ces dynamiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".