Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following report summarizes efforts on "Characterization of Pulsed Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) System". Specifically the effort focused on evaluating the operational characteristics of the EM-63 pulsed electromagnetic induction (EMI) system manufactured and sold by Geonics Ltd. at 8-1745 Meyerside Drove, Mississsauga, Ontario L5T 1C6 (Web site: http://www.geonics.com). A significant part of the effort was consumed in returning the EM-63 to the manufacturer for repairs. In particular we discovered that the transmitter current pulse did not conform to the manufacture's specifications. As discussed in greater detail below, the correct transmitter current waveform consists of a positive current pulse followed (temporally) by a negative current pulse that in turn is followed by a short duration positive current pulse. Measurements indicated that the transmitter current waveform on our EM-63 had only a positive current waveform. It was necessary to return the EM-63 to the manufacturer twice for repairs since we discovered that the transmitter current waveform was still not correct after the first repair effort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".