MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detection of<i>N</i>‐acetyl methionine in human and murine brain and neuronal and glial derived cell lines

2011· article· en· W1937469516 on OpenAlexaff
Tara Smith, M. Saïd Ghandour, Paul L. Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsPhenomenome Discoveries (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethionineHuman brainBiologyEndogenyToxicityAcetylationBrain tissueMetabolismBiochemistryChemistryEndocrinologyInternal medicineNeuroscienceMedicineGeneAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the fact that N-acetyl methionine (NAM) supplementation has long been reported as a bioavailable source of methionine in humans, and known to reduce liver toxicity after acetaminophen overdose, its cellular endogenous presence has never been investigated. We demonstrate for the first time that NAM is present in both human and mouse tissues and cells in culture. A wide variety of cultured cells, including a number of brain derived cell types, as well as mouse and human brain tissue all have clearly detectable levels of NAM. Methionine is rapidly acetylated to form NAM in cultured human oligodendroglioma cells with an initial rate of 0.44 ± 0.064 atom percent excess per minute. The presence of measurable quantities of NAM in brain cells in combination with its rapid formation point to a potential physiological role for N-acetylated methionine in the brain. Aminoacylase 1 is responsible for metabolism of NAM to methionine and acetate. Deficiencies in aminoacylase 1 have been linked to a variety of neurological disorders; however, it is unclear whether and how the brain is affected by this defect. The reported presence of NAM in the human brain may provide an invaluable key to discovering the link between aminoacylase 1 mutations and neurological problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207